This FOI arose from a concern about verse-final words with two Unicode METEG marks. The concern, which turns out to be unfounded, was that a word might contain a meteg in the narrow sense (געיה) after the mark that serves as silluq.

To investigate that concern, the output collects words containing at least two Unicode METEG marks and groups them by whether sof pasuq and maqaf are present. In the labels below, sopa-y and sopa-n mean that sof pasuq is present or absent, respectively, and maq-y and maq-n mean that maqaf is present or absent, respectively.

One cell of that grid is empty: no chanted word without a maqaf, that is, no single atom, ends its verse with a silluq and two further metegs. The neighbouring cells show what does occur. A single atom that ends its verse with a silluq and one meteg is common, and a verse-final maqaf compound sometimes spreads a silluq and two metegs across its atoms.

That absence is scarcity rather than a rule. Neither Yeivin's Introduction to the Tiberian Masorah nor Breuer's The Cantillation of Scripture makes the number of metegs on a word depend on whether that word has a silluq, and the few shapes that do have two metegs mid-verse, chiefly hitpael forms and theophoric names ending in יה, hardly ever end a verse at all. The rate at which a mid-verse single atom has a second meteg is low enough to predict fewer than one such verse-final atom in the whole corpus, so an empty cell is what MAM should show even with no rule behind it. The file doc/foi-mtgmtg-empty-cell.md in MAM-basics states the case in full, with the section citations and the arithmetic.

# 1/sopa-y/maq-n: Immediately below, the first 5 of 354 are shown. No more are shown. See JSON output for full list.

(The label «1/sopa-y/maq-n» means that the word contains 1 Unicode METEG mark in addition to the verse-final one serving as silluq, with sof pasuq present, and with maqaf absent.)

הָֽאֲדָמָֽה׃	G2:6
הַֽחַיִּֽים׃	G3:24
לַֽיהֹוָֽה׃	G4:3
יַֽהַרְגֵֽנִי׃	G4:14
נַֽעֲמָֽה׃	G4:22

# 1/sopa-y/maq-y: Immediately below, the first 5 of 228 are shown. No more are shown. See JSON output for full list.

(The label «1/sopa-y/maq-y» means that the word contains 1 Unicode METEG mark in addition to the verse-final one serving as silluq, with sof pasuq present, and with maqaf present.)

וַֽיְהִי־אֽוֹר׃	G1:3
וַֽיְהִי־כֵֽן׃	G1:7
וַֽיְהִי־כֵֽן׃	G1:9
וַֽיְהִי־כֵֽן׃	G1:11
וַֽיְהִי־כֵֽן׃	G1:15

# 2/sopa-n/maq-n: Immediately below, all 19 are shown.

(The label «2/sopa-n/maq-n» means that the word contains 2 Unicode METEG marks, with sof pasuq absent, and with maqaf absent.)

הַֽמְﬞלַֽקְﬞקִים֙	Ju7:7
לִֽהְיֽוֹתְכֶ֤ם	Ee36:3
בְּהִֽתְפַּֽלְﬞל֖וֹ	Jb42:10
וִֽיטִֽיבְךָ֤	Ec11:9
וְֽאַֽחֲוָיַ֨ת	Da5:12
וָֽאֶתְפַּֽלְלָ֛ה	Da9:4
וּֽשְׁמַֽעְיָ֔ה	Er10:21
שְֽׁמַֽעְיָ֧ה	Ne6:10
לִֽידַֽעְיָ֖ה	Ne12:19
לִֽידַֽעְיָ֖ה	Ne12:21
וּֽשְׁמַֽעְיָ֖ה	Ne12:34
וּֽשְׁמַֽעְיָ֜ה	Ne12:42
וּֽזְרַֽחְיָ֖ה	1C5:32
יִֽזְרַֽחְיָ֑ה	1C7:3
יִֽזְרַֽחְיָ֗ה	1C7:3
וְהִֽתְפַּֽלְל֞וּ	2C6:26
וְהִֽתְפַּֽלְל֖וּ	2C6:32
וְהִֽתְפַּֽלְﬞל֗וּ	2C6:38
וְיִֽתְפַּֽלְﬞלוּ֙	2C7:14

# 2/sopa-n/maq-y: Immediately below, the first 5 of 102 are shown. No more are shown. See JSON output for full list.

(The label «2/sopa-n/maq-y» means that the word contains 2 Unicode METEG marks, with sof pasuq absent, and with maqaf present.)

וַיִּֽקַּֽח־ל֥וֹ	G4:19
וְלֹֽא־יִֽהְיֶ֨ה	G9:15
וַיִּֽקַּֽח־ל֣וֹ	G15:10
וַיִּֽקַּֽח־לֶ֩חֶם֩	G21:14
וַתִּֽקַּֽח־ל֥וֹ	G21:21

# 2/sopa-y/maq-y: Immediately below, all 14 are shown.

(The label «2/sopa-y/maq-y» means that the word contains 2 Unicode METEG marks in addition to the verse-final one serving as silluq, with sof pasuq present, and with maqaf present.)

יִֽסְלַֽח־לָֽהּ׃	N30:9
יִֽסְלַֽח־לָֽהּ׃	N30:13
יִֽקַּֽח־לֵֽב׃	Ho4:11
הַֽנַּֽח־לֽוֹ׃	Ho4:17
אִם־תִּֽשְׁמַֽע־לִֽי׃	Ps81:9
שְֽׂבַֽע־לָֽחֶם׃	Pr20:13
יִֽשְׂבַּֽע־רִֽישׁ׃	Pr28:19
יִֽשְׂבַּֽע־לָֽחֶם׃	Pr30:22
מַֽפַּֽח־נָֽפֶשׁ׃	Jb11:20
וּֽשְׂבַֽע־רֹֽגֶז׃	Jb14:1
לֹֽא־יָדַֽע־אֵֽל׃	Jb18:21
תִּֽמְנַֽע־לָֽחֶם׃	Jb22:7
אֶֽתֵּֽן־צֶֽדֶק׃	Jb36:3
הֽוּנַֽח־לָֽנוּ׃	La5:5