The scribe of μL probably intended a דחי but placed it like a טרחא. The מלא/חסר spelling difference is not important to us here.

BHQ places the mark a little left of center. Though this placement is odd, this makes it clear that a טרחא was intended by BHQ rather than a דחי. Thus BHQ somewhat-accurately transcribes the quirk in μL, but should have noted the quirk. Perhaps even better would have been to (charitably) transcribe this as a דחי, and note the quirk. But it is not the editorial policy of BHQ to make such notes: although BHQ is full of charitable transcriptions, as far as I know it never notes its charity.

U — M — μL (page 403B, col 2, line 2):

μA (Aleppo) (page 276r, col 1, line 17, word 5):

μY (Cambridge 1753) (page 79A, col 2, line 9, word 2):

[p] ← prev   next → [n]