רֹעֵ֣ה (?)
רֹעֶ֣ה
24:21 צירה not סגול in μL, maybe,
says BHL and DM but not BHQ

Perhaps there is some very faint evidence of a third dot that would make a סגול, but this could be just wishful thinking. Note that there is a third dot above the two clearer dots, but I take that to be part of the ע that did not flake off like its neighboring ink did. — BHQ silently supplies the סגול that is the consensus expectation. I.e. despite little or no evidence for it in μL, BHQ silently infers a third dot centered below the two clearer dots. — UM — μL (page 404A, col 1, line -6 (6 counting from bottom of column)):

μA (Aleppo) (page 276v, col 1, line 10, word 1):

μY (Cambridge 1753) (page 79B, col 2, line 4, word 1):

[p] ← prevnext → [n]