חַי
חַי־
27:2 מקף is absent in μL,
says BHL and DM but not BHQ

Perhaps there was a מקף that was ignored during re-inking, leaving only some very faint evidence of this מקף. In μA, as in μL, evidence of מקף is minimal. In μY, the מקף is clear. By the way, in μL, the evidence for the דחי on the א of the next word is very faint. — BHQ silently supplies the מקף that is the consensus expectation, despite little or no evidence for it in μL. — UM — μL (page 404A, col 2, line -2 (2 counting from bottom of column)):

μA (Aleppo) (page 276v, col 2, line 11, word 1):

μY (Cambridge 1753) (page 80A, col 1, line 8, word 1):

[p] ← prevnext → [n]