Notes

235-1

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to superscript the “e”, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

236-1

Presumably Jacobson just accidentally misplaced the stress, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

242-1, 242-2

242-1

In this first appearance (page 242), this word appears without an accent, i.e. as עׇזִּי. Subsequently, it appears with mahapakh.

242-2

In this first appearance (page 242), this word appears without a locale reference, by design. Subsequently, it appears with locale reference Exod. 15:2.

242-3

Presumably Jacobson just accidentally used the wrong type of single quote, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

242-4, 242-5

242-4

I have added ־הֲמ֥וֹן since I think it is relevant that the syllable אַב is unstressed. Just having the monosyllabic word אַב without an accent is ambiguous as to whether the accent’s absence is relevant. For example, in a similar context above, אֶל and אֵל appear without an accent but presumably the accent’s absence is not relevant.

242-5

Presumably Jacobson just accidentally used the wrong type of single quote, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

248-1

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to superscript the “e”, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

266-1

There is typo in Jacobson identifying the locale reference as Gen. 1:51 instead of 15:1.

271-1

The same word (וַיָּ֣קׇם), down to the accent (munaḥ) appears later on the same page (271), and on page 272. But in those later two places, a different locale reference is used: Gen. 22:3. I assume this is unintentional.

271-2

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to include an opening single quote for ayin, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

272-1

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to transcribe the לְ prefix, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

272-2

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to include a closing single quote (apostrophe) for alef, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

278-1

283-1, 283-2

283-1

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to superscript the “e”, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.

283-2

The locale reference in Jacobson is Exod. 20:11, which is correct in BHS verse numbering. The locale reference I give here is Exod. 20:10 because that is correct for the Al-Hatorah edition of MAM, which is my source for the pointed Hebrew in the table above, and it is the source for the pointed Hebrew fed to my automatic transliteration algorithm.

290-1

There is typo in Jacobson identifying the locale reference as Jer. 16:12 instead of 6:12.

303-1

Footnote callout says 145, which seems odd. The callout for 145 appears between callouts for 114 and 115. The callouts for 114 and 115 correspond to a footnote, but these are the only two footnotes on this page. I.e., there is no footnote corresponding to the callout for 145.

308-1

There is typo in Jacobson identifying the locale reference as 2 Sam 12:10 instead of Gen. 31:24. I.e. this is sort of (but only sort of) swapped with the locale reference below. The Gen. locale reference is correct but misplaced; the 2 Sam. locale reference is not only misplaced, but also one verse off (should be 12:11 not 12:10).

308-2

There is typo in Jacobson identifying the locale reference as Gen. 31:24 instead of 2 Sam 12:11. I.e. this is sort of (but only sort of) swapped with the locale reference above. The Gen. locale reference is correct but misplaced; the 2 Sam. locale reference is not only misplaced, but also one verse off (should be 12:11 not 12:10).

309-1

Presumably Jacobson just forgot to include a closing single quote (apostrophe) for alef, i.e. presumably this is not a real disagreement in transcription, but rather just a typo.