A dot under the מ of עמו is fairly clear. It is (charitably) not transcribed by BHL-A, presumably based on the consensus expectation that it is absent.

Note that instead of a masorah circle, μY uses a pair of above-dots as a “callout” for a Masorah parva note; hence the pair of above-dots above ל in ושלם. See 19:16 for another example of this two-dot callout notation.

BHQ fails to note that the אתנח it transcribes on עמו disagrees with μA and μY.

U — M — μL (page 403B, col 1, line -6 (6 counting from bottom of column)):

μA (Aleppo) (page 276r, col 1, line 10, word 3):

μY (Cambridge 1753) (page 79A, col 2, line 1, word 7):

[p] ← prev   next → [n]