| הוֹחַ֨לְתִּי הוֹחַ֨לְתִּי׀ |
32:11 | לגרמיה is absent in μL, says BHQ’s implication |
As DM footnote 32 mentions, in two cases in Job, μL omits the לגרמיה stroke before a word with געיה and רביע. The other such case is 34:33. In both cases, it looks like there may have been an erasure in between the words, where one would expect a לגרמיה to have been, if one was originally present in μL. — U — M — μL (page 406A, col 2, line 1):
μA (Aleppo) (page 278v, col 1, line 4, word 2):
μY (Cambridge 1753) (page 81B, col 2, line 18, word 6):
